1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar
 
 
 
The National College Magazine
 
Current Issue
Select Previous Issues
Summer 2010
U Magazine
Spring 2010
U Magazine
Winter 2009
U Magazine
Fall 2009
U Magazine
Spring 2009
U Magazine
20th Anniversary Issue
U Magazine
Summer 2008
U Magazine
Spring 2008
U Magazine
Winter 2007
U Magazine
Fall 2007
U Magazine
Summer 2007
U Magazine
Spring 2007
U Magazine
Winter 2006
U Magazine
Fall 2006
U Magazine
Summer 2006
U Magazine
Spring 2006
U Magazine
Winter 2005
U Magazine
Fall 2005
U Magazine
Summer 2005
U Magazine
Spring 2005
U Magazine
Winter 2004
U Magazine
Fall 2004
U Magazine
Spring 2004
U Magazine
Winter 2003
Fall 2003
Spring 2003

U.Mag's Top 25 Articles
From wacky college stories to celebrity interviews, these are our favorite U. articles of all time.
Features
Binge Drinking: A College National Pastime?
Body Image: Taken Too Seriously?
Crime on Campuses
Campus Clips
Admissions Without SAT
Is Your School Cool?
Master's Degree: Worth It?
Tech Talk
Student CEO's
Digital Plagiarism
Turn Off Your Cell Phone!
Online Exclusives
Backpack Europe
Find advice before you go.
1-800 Database
Full of dial-up help.
Arts & Entertainment
NC-17: It Ain't Right!
Dr. Drew On the Web
Dixie Chicks Set To Fly
Cooking w/ Chef Rossi
One Pot Suppers
Pasta Bada-Bing!
Cocktail Hour Munchies
Health & Nutrition
Brain Food for Finals
Abstinence on Campus
Suicide Gene?
U. Archives
 
Admissions
Find a College or University
Get Help Writing Your Admissions Essay
Financial Aid
Find a Scholarship
 
 
 

Print this article


Sure, we all gripe about tuition, but most of us don't take the time to find out exactly where all those miscellaneous fees go. Three law students at the U. of Wisconsin, Madison, did take the time, and they didn't like what they found. In fact, they were so pissed off about it, they sued the administration in 1996. Now, their case, Southworth vs. Grebe, is headed for the U.S. Supreme Court this fall.

In the case, students Scott Southworth, Amy Schoepke and Keith Bannach – who have since graduated – claim that paying mandatory fees that go toward campus organizations that oppose their ideological or political beliefs is a violation of their free-speech rights. Meanwhile, the university argues that in a college atmosphere of differing viewpoints, all campus groups are entitled to support.

"In order to attend a public university, these students are forced to fund groups who advocate opposing beliefs. I think it's very coercive. If they don't pay these funds, they can't graduate, they can't get their transcripts," says Jordan Lorence, the students' attorney.

So far, the law seems to be siding with the students, who have gotten four more UW students to join the plaintiff list. And in a landmark ruling in August 1998, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided the school did not have a "vital policy interest" compelling enough to require a student to pay fees for groups with differing ideologies. Although the court's decision only applies to universities in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin, it will probably affect the regulation of student fees at public universities everywhere. Stay tuned.

By Terry Tang, UCLA, Editorial Intern

Return to Table of Contents

Print this article